rules enabling act造句

• Under the Rules Enabling Act, the restyled amendments took effect.
• This Court adopted the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and submitted them to Congress as the Rules Enabling Act required.
• The enactment of the Rules Enabling Act on June 19, 1934, was a revolutionary moment in the history of civil procedure in the United States.
• Unlike most other states, California never followed the federal trend towards transferring authority over procedural law to the courts through statutes like the federal Rules Enabling Act.
• However, the forms of action persisted in the federal courts until 1938, when the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were promulgated pursuant to the Rules Enabling Act.
• After years of bitter infighting within the American bench and bar, the federal procedural reform movement culminated in the enactment of the Rules Enabling Act on June 19, 1934.
• Because the RDA provides for exceptions and modifications by Congress, it is important to note the effect of the Rules Enabling Act ( REA ), 28 U . S . C . 2072.
• The United States Supreme Court circulated drafts of the FRE in 1969, 1971 and 1972, but Congress then exercised its power under the Rules Enabling Act to suspend implementation of the FRE until it could study them further.
• There was significant opposition to the new rules in Congress and hearings were held by both House and Senate committees, but the Rules Enabling Act required Congress to affirmatively override the Supreme Court's adoption of rules pursuant to the Act.
• As noted above, Congress has never stepped in to resolve the circuit split on the test for preliminary injunctions, and did not do so in this case, even though it has the power to do so under the Rules Enabling Act.
• But, in other contexts, the Supreme Court has drawn a careful line between those things that can be accomplished by judicial interpretation and those that should be handled through the procedures set up in the Rules Enabling Act, 28 U . S . C . ?2071 et seq.
• The Rules Enabling Act, 28 U . S . C . s2071 et seq ., gives this Court " the power to prescribe general rules of practice and procedure . . . for cases in the United States district courts . . . and courts of appeals . " s2072 ( a ).
• We should be especially reluctant to identify new categories of " collateral orders " now that Congress has, by adding 28 U . S . C . s2072 ( c ) to the Rules Enabling Act, " designat ( ed ) . . . the rulemaking process as the way to define or refine when a district court ruling is ` final'and when an interlocutory order is appealable ."